Abstract

This article proposes a new evaluation of relevance in the context of relevance theory (RT). Although RT has made substantial contributions to communication science, there are few studies that employ an experimental setting to examine RT in the real-time interpretation of utterances because the evaluation of relevance has remained inadequate for experimental examination. In the original RT, relevance is evaluated based on cognitive effects and processing costs, which are mutually dependent—although conceptually distinct—in the real-time interpretation of utterances. In fact, the mutual dependence of cognitive effects and processing costs is the primary reason why RT is difficult to investigate experimentally. This article proposes cognitive effects as a sigmoid function of processing costs and relevance as the ratio of cognitive effects to the processing costs required. This new evaluation of relevance is shown to have favorable theoretical consequences regarding both the convergence of the computation of utterance interpretation and the disambiguation of potentially ambiguous utterances. Furthermore, this new evaluation of relevance enhances the possibilities of examining RT experimentally.

Highlights

  • IntroductionPotential Problems with Relevance Theory in Real-Time Interpretation of Utterances

  • Potential Problems with Relevance Theory in Real-Time Interpretation of UtterancesRelevance theory (RT) has made substantial contributions to linguistics and to both the communication and cognitive sciences

  • I claim that relevance can be evaluated as the ratio of cognitive effects to the processing costs required for these effects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Potential Problems with Relevance Theory in Real-Time Interpretation of Utterances. Relevance theory (RT) has made substantial contributions to linguistics and to both the communication and cognitive sciences. There are few studies that examine the plausibility of RT in the real-time interpretation of utterances or that utilize RT as an experimental framework to investigate the understanding of implicature. An even more important reason from a theoretical perspective involves the evaluation of relevance. I claim that relevance can be evaluated as the ratio of cognitive effects to the processing costs required for these effects. I demonstrate that my proposal produces favorable theoretical consequences regarding both the convergence of the computation of the interpretation of utterances and the disambiguation of potentially ambiguous utterances. I demonstrate that the function of relevance has an extremal value and that this property of the function produces favorable theoretical consequences for understanding the intentions of a speaker

Mutual Dependence between Cognitive Effects and Processing Costs
Relevance in Real-Time Interpretation of Utterances
Convergence of Computation
Ambiguity of Interpretation
Experimental Examination
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call