Abstract
The CPC has greatly innocame the systematics of provisional injunction, when it regulates the protection of evidence, in art. 311. The purpose of this study is a rereading of Art. 311, in order to demonstrate the importance of the institute of evidence protection when it is based on precedents. And the challenge would be to apply this institute not only in the precedents based on cases of repetitive thesis and binding summary, but also in the hypotheses provided for in art. 927, of the CPC, and in the provisions of Art. 332 of the CPC. Therefore, what is intended is the expansion of the hypotheses of application of art. 311, II, seeking a systematic reading of this article with art. 927 and art. 332 of the procedural diploma.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
