Abstract

The potential of the parasitoid Aphidius rhopalosiphi for controlling cereal aphids was tested in 16 m2 field cage experiments in 1998 and 1999. In the first year, aphids and parasitoids were released in cages containing naturally occurring populations of aphids and their natural enemies. In the second year, aphids and parasitoids were released in cages which had been cleared of insects by applying insecticide. The growths of the aphid populations in the different cages were analysed and compared. In 1998, the release of 50 pairs of parasitoids per cage had no significant effect on aphid population growth relative to that in the control cages. Even though the aphid population growth rates were less than 60% of that in the control cages, in the cages in which 100 pairs and 200 pairs of parasitoids were released, it was not possible to show they statistically differed. The aphid populations in these three cages were held below 10 aphids per tiller. In 1999, the aphid density was higher and the population grew faster than in 1998. The release of 100 and 200 parasitoids per cage significantly reduced aphid population growth. A. rhopalosiphi seemed to be a good control agent in field cages, provided they were released at the beginning of aphid population growth.

Highlights

  • Parasitoids are promising biocontrol agents as they con­ stitute 80% of the successful examples of biological con­ trol in the world (Van Lenteren, 1986)

  • In 1998, aphid population growth was the result of naturally occurring aphids and introduced laboratory-raised aphids (M. dirhodum)

  • Natural enemies were left in the cages: parasitoids of different species (Aphidius spp. and Praon spp.) were seen in the cages, but they were not counted

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Parasitoids are promising biocontrol agents as they con­ stitute 80% of the successful examples of biological con­ trol in the world (Van Lenteren, 1986). The results must be interpreted with caution as field cages allow the systems studied to experi­ ence approximately natural abiotic conditions the cage may influence these abiotic conditions and the behaviour of the insects They are semi-natural conditions, which prevent the dispersal of the released parasitoids and the immigration of pests. Holler & Haardt (1993) compared the parasitism by Aphelinus abdominalis Dalman (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae) of Sitobion avenae Fabricius, and found that the parasitism levels in small field cages (enclosing two wheat tillers) reached only 25% of the laboratory levels They concluded that A. abdominalis females were unable or unwilling to parasitize high numbers of aphids in the field, but could not explain this phenomenon

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call