Abstract
A coherent optical (CO) orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) scheme gives a scalable and flexible solution for increasing the transmission rate, being extremely robust to chromatic dispersion as well as polarization mode dispersion. Nevertheless, as any coherent-detection OFDM system, the overall system performance is limited by laser phase noises. On the other hand, extreme learning machines (ELMs) have gained a lot of attention from the machine learning community owing to good generalization performance, negligible learning speed, and minimum human intervention. In this manuscript, a phase-error mitigation method based on the single-hidden layer feedforward network prone to the improved ELM algorithm for CO-OFDM systems is introduced for the first time. In the training step, two steps are distinguished. Firstly, pilots are used, which is very common in OFDM-based systems, to diminish laser phase noises as well as to correct frequency-selective impairments and, therefore, the bandwidth efficiency can be maximized. Secondly, the regularization parameter is included in the ELM to balance the empirical and structural risks, namely to minimize the root mean square error in the test stage and, consequently, the bit error rate (BER) metric. The operational principle of the real-complex (RC) ELM is analytically explained, and then, its sub-parameters (number of hidden neurons, regularization parameter, and activation function) are numerically found in order to enhance the system performance. For binary and quadrature phase-shift keying modulations, the RC-ELM outperforms the benchmark pilot-assisted equalizer as well as the fully-real ELM, and almost matches the common phase error (CPE) compensation and the ELM defined in the complex domain (C-ELM) in terms of the BER over an additive white Gaussian noise channel and different laser oscillators. However, both techniques are characterized by the following disadvantages: the CPE compensator reduces the transmission rate since an additional preamble is mandatory for channel estimation purposes, while the C-ELM requires a bounded and differentiable activation function in the complex domain and can not follow semi-supervised training. In the same context, the novel ELM algorithm can not compete with the CPE compensator and C-ELM for the 16-ary quadrature amplitude modulation. On the other hand, the novel ELM exposes a negligible computational cost with respect to the C-ELM and PAE methods.
Highlights
For optical fiber transmissions, intersymbol interference originated by polarization-mode dispersion and chromatic dispersion becomes relevant as the bit rate achieves the order of various tens of Gbps [1]
Following the procedure used in studies about extreme learning machines (ELMs) for equalizing orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signals [21,24], we develop a comparison of the complexity for the five methods (PAE, real ELM (R-ELM), C-ELM, RC-ELM, and common phase error (CPE) compensation) in terms of the training, testing, and total times elapsed in the phase-noise correction stage, where the OFDM demodulator would expose modifications in its realization
We introduced a new ELM with its hidden layer defined in the real plane based on the adoption of pilot subcarriers as training set and the inclusion of the regularization parameter in the learning algorithm
Summary
Intersymbol interference originated by polarization-mode dispersion and chromatic dispersion becomes relevant as the bit rate achieves the order of various tens of Gbps [1]. Taking into account the RF phase error as well as the subcarrier modulation format, we find the sub-optimal ELM parameters (the number of hidden nodes, penalty coefficient, and activation function) that yield the best BER via extensive simulations This result is explained by the evaluation of the error vector magnitude (EVM) metric in the training as well as testing steps, which can properly quantify the root mean square error for complex numbers in the telecommunication industry. For several signal to noise ratio (SNR) levels and RF-linewidth values, we respectively observe the superiority, and competitiveness of the novel ELM algorithm in terms of the BER metric among the benchmark PAE and a fully-real ELM, and the sophisticated ELM defined in the complex plane and non-effective bandwidth CPE compensator for binary phase-shift keying (BPSK) and QPSK modes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.