Abstract

The structural stability of the prototypical complex ${\mathrm{Al}}_{12}$W structure, relative to the ${\mathrm{Cu}}_{3}$Au structure, is computed for Al compounds with 3d and 4d transition metals. The calculated structural energy differences are on the order of an eV per transition-metal atom, have their largest negative magnitude for the transition metals with nearly half-filled d bands, and have larger magnitudes for the 4d transition metals than for the 3d metals. These results suggest that electronic effects are more important than atomic-size effects. It is shown that a large part of the structural energy differences is due to the presence of a Fermi-level nonbonding peak in the electronic density of states (DOS) for the ${\mathrm{Cu}}_{3}$Au structure, which destabilizes that structure. The energy associated with the nonbonding peak has comparable contributions from a term in the energy that favors large unit-cell sizes, and from a local term that penalizes 90\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{} bond angles around the transition-metal atoms. A significant additional contribution comes from the appearance of the dip in the DOS around the Fermi level for the ${\mathrm{Al}}_{12}$W structure. It is shown that the energetic factors developed here likely contribute to the relative stability of binary Al--transition-metal icosahedral phases.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.