Abstract

As control precision for Earth-orbiting formations increases, the required can quickly become infeasible. Missions have demonstrated approximately for 10-m control (TanDEM-X), but that quickly grows to approximately for 1.5-m control (CanX-4/5). Previous research has shown that formation reference trajectories must use high-fidelity relative orbital dynamics; otherwise, is spent rejecting modeling errors. However, even with a perfect reference trajectory, feeding back relative state estimation errors can drive . This paper presents a linear time-invariant analysis approach that quantifies the three-way trade-off between mission , control precision, and estimation error for approximately circular orbits and verifies the approach through high-fidelity simulations, including tracking an ideal reference trajectory that eliminates the cost of modeling errors. Because Linear Quadratic Regulator control is used, the resulting can be considered a lower bound on the required , assuming linear control and quadratic cost. Using reference trajectories based on simplified dynamics, such as without differential J2, would only increase . Using this analysis approach, for example, the minimum required capability of a relative sensing and estimation system could be determined given a mission concept’s capability and control requirements for science.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.