Relative rDNA copy number is not associated with resistance training-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy and does not affect myotube anabolism in vitro.

Abstract

Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) copies exist across multiple chromosomes and inter-individual variation in copy number is speculated to influence the hypertrophic response to resistance training. Thus, we examined if rDNA copy number was associated with resistance training-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Participants (n=53 males, 21±1 years old; n=29 females, 21±2 years old) performed 10-12 weeks of full-body resistance training. Hypertrophy outcomes were determined, as was relative rDNA copy number from pre-intervention vastus lateralis (VL) biopsies. Pre- and post-intervention VL biopsy total RNA was assayed in all participants, and mRNA/rRNA markers of ribosome content and biogenesis were also assayed in the 29 females prior to training, 24 hours following training bout 1, and in the basal state after 10 weeks of training. Across all participants, no significant associations were evident between relative rDNA copy number and training-induced changes in whole body lean mass (r = -0.034, p=0.764), vastus lateralis thickness (r = 0.093, p=0.408), mean myofiber cross-sectional area (r = -0.128, p=0.259), or changes in muscle RNA concentrations (r = 0.026, p=0.818), and these trends were similar when examining each gender. However, all Pol-I regulon mRNAs as well as 45S pre-rRNA, 28S rRNA and 18S rRNA increased 24 hours following the first training bout in females. Follow-up studies using LHCN-M2 myotubes demonstrated a reduction in relative rDNA copy number induced by bisphenol A (BPA) did not significantly affect insulin-like-growth factor-induced myotube hypertrophy. These findings suggest relative rDNA copy number is not associated with myofiber hypertrophy.