Relative prevalence and outcomes of low gradient severe aortic stenosis in routine clinical practice

Abstract

Abstract Background The prevalence and outcomes of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS), in particular low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) severe AS, have not been well characterized. Objectives We sought to delineate the relative prevalence and outcomes of patients with low-gradient severe AS in routine clinical cardiology practice. Methods Data were derived from the National Echocardiography Database of Australia (NEDA), a national multicentre clinical registry with data linkage to mortality. A total of 192,060 adults with native aortic valve profiling from 2000–2019 were identified, of whom 12,013 (6.3%) had severe AS (aged 75.3±13.1 years, 53.5% men). Severe AS subtypes were determined using standard echocardiographic criteria. All-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality were assessed on an adjusted basis (age and sex) in 8,162 patients with classifiable severe AS subtypes, during mean follow-up of 88±45 months. Additionally, rates of recorded Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) during follow-up were compared between AS groups. Results 5,601 patients (47%) had high-gradient and 6,412 patients (53%) had low-gradient severe AS. In the low-gradient group, Stroke Volume Index data was recorded in 2,741 patients; 1,750 (64%) had LFLG and 991 (36%) had normal-flow low-gradient (NFLG). For LFLG patients, 1,570 had LV ejection fraction recorded; 959 (61%) had paradoxical LFLG and 651 (39%) had classical LFLG. Adjusted 5-year cardiovascular mortality rates were 28% in high-gradient, 24% in NFLG, 27% in paradoxical LFLG and 50% in classical LFLG patients (p<0.001). Rates of recorded AVR per mean follow-up years were 5.2% for high-gradient, 4.0% for NFLG, 3.1% for classical LFLG and 2.4% for paradoxical LFLG severe AS (p<0.001). Conclusions Approximately half the subjects with echocardiographic features of severe AS in routine clinical practice have low-gradient haemodynamics, associated with long-term mortality comparable to or worse than high-gradient severe AS. The poorest survival was associated with classical LFLG severe AS. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Summary illustration5 year mortality curves