Abstract
This paper simulates the performance of synthetic put portfolio insurance and Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance (CPPI) using Australian data for the period from 1992 to 2000. These strategies are implemented by trading in the index and bills and simulation is conducted across 18 scenarios. We find that while the CPPI dominates in scenarios using daily rebalancing, the synthetic put strategy delivers better outcomes when value based triggers are used. More importantly, although the two per cent market move trigger emerges as the optimal rebalancing choice, overall, neither strategy appears justifiable in terms of achieving downside protection or allowing upside gain.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
