Abstract
There are two methods to combine oil and gas reserve quantities and values, an energy-based conversion method and a revenue-based conversion method. Prior academic research on the valuation of reserve quantities has used the energy-based conversion method, but he validity of the energy-based conversion has been questioned in the accounting literature (Lys, 1986; Koester, 1993). The purpose of this study was to examine whether total proven reserves calculated using a revenue-based conversion method was more value-relevant than total proven reserves calculated using an energy-based conversion method. The research hypothesis was tested with two methods, each using a pooled, cross-sectional (panel data) sample of 399 film-years from the Arthur Andersen Oil and Gas Reserve Disclosure Database 1989–1993. The empirical results provided no support for the hypothesis that a revenue-based conversion method was superior to an evergy-based conversion method for valuation purposes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
