Abstract

Abstract. Misrepresentations of wind shear and stratification around the tropopause in numerical weather prediction models can lead to errors in potential vorticity gradients with repercussions for Rossby wave propagation and baroclinic instability. Using a diabatic extension of the linear quasi-geostrophic Eady model featuring a tropopause, we investigate the influence of such discrepancies on baroclinic instability by varying tropopause sharpness and altitude as well as wind shear and stratification in the lower stratosphere, which can be associated with model or data assimilation errors or a downward extension of a weakened polar vortex. We find that baroclinic development is less sensitive to tropopause sharpness than to modifications in wind shear and stratification in the lower stratosphere, where the latter are associated with a net change in the vertical integral of the horizontal potential vorticity gradient across the tropopause. To further quantify the relevance of these sensitivities, we compare these findings to the impact of including mid-tropospheric latent heating. For representative modifications of wind shear, stratification, and latent heating intensity, the sensitivity of baroclinic instability to tropopause structure is significantly less than that to latent heating of different intensities. These findings indicate that tropopause sharpness might be less important for baroclinic development than previously anticipated and that latent heating and the structure in the lower stratosphere could play a more crucial role, with latent heating being the dominant factor.

Highlights

  • The tropopause is characterised by sharp vertical transitions in vertical wind shear and stratification, resulting in large horizontal and vertical gradients of potential vorticity (PV) (e.g. Birner et al, 2006; Schäfler et al, 2020)

  • Including sharp and smooth transitions of vertical wind shear and stratification across a finite tropopause in a linear QG model extended from the Eady (1949) model, we investigated the relative importance of changes across the tropopause region at different degrees of smoothing on baroclinic development and compared its sensitivity to that of diabatic heating

  • We found that impacts related to tropopause structure are secondary to diabatic heating related to midtropospheric latent heating

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The tropopause is characterised by sharp vertical transitions in vertical wind shear and stratification, resulting in large horizontal and vertical gradients of potential vorticity (PV) (e.g. Birner et al, 2006; Schäfler et al, 2020). While the modelling challenges related to the model lid, model resolution, data assimilation techniques, and observations typically lead to a smoothing of the sharp PV gradients around the tropopause, they may contribute to misrepresentations of wind (Schäfler et al, 2020) and temperature (Pilch Kedzierski et al, 2016) in the stratosphere that result in further deviations in the stratospheric PV gradients. Even if such deviations were small, a change in the difference in wind shear and stratification across a finite tropopause alters the vertical integral of the horizontal PV gradient. We include the effect of latent heating and contrast its impact on baroclinic growth to the structure of the tropopause

Model setup and solution procedure
Smoothing procedure
Energy equations
Validity of QG assumptions
Control setup with sharp jet and stratification jump
Impact of smoothing the tropopause on baroclinic growth
Sensitivity to vertical extent and altitude of tropopause
Changes in growth rate and corresponding forecast error
Sensitivity to latent heating intensity
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call