Abstract

AME Aquatic Microbial Ecology Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsSpecials AME 38:259-267 (2005) - doi:10.3354/ame038259 Relative importance of the different negative effects of the toxic haptophyte Prymnesium parvum on Rhodomonas salina and Brachionus plicatilis Aldo Barreiro1,*, Cástor Guisande1, Isabel Maneiro1, Trinh Phuong Lien2, Catherine Legrand3, Timo Tamminen4, Sirpa Lehtinen4, Pauliina Uronen5, Edna Granéli3 1Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Vigo, Lagoas-Marcosende 36200 Vigo, Spain2Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Institut für Ernährungwissenchaften, Dornburger Strasse 25, 07743 Jena, Germany3Marine Sciences Department, University of Kalmar, 391 82 Kalmar, Sweden4Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Research Department/Baltic Sea Protection Research, Plankton Ecology Team, 00251 Helsinki, Finland5Tvärminne Zoological Station, 10900 Hanko, Finland *Email: aldo@uvigo.es ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to determine the relative importance of the different processes/mechanisms by which the toxic haptophyte Prymnesium parvum, cultured under different nutrient conditions, affects non-toxic phytoplankton competitors and microzooplankton grazers. P. parvum was cultured under steady-state growth in different nutrient conditions: nitrogen depleted (–N), phosphorus depleted (–P) and balanced nitrogen and phosphorus (+NP). Cells from each nutrient condition and culture cell-free filtrates, alone and combined with non-toxic prey (Rhodomonas salina), were used as food for the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. An additional experiment was carried out to test the effect of P. parvum cells and culture cell-free filtrate on R. salina. The highest haemolytic activity values were achieved by –P P. parvum cultures, followed by –N. However, the negative effect of P. parvum on R. salina and rotifers did not correlate with haemolytic activity but with the number of P. parvum cells. –N-cultured P. parvum were the most toxic for both R. salina and rotifers, followed by +NP. Therefore, haemolytic activity is not a good indicator of the total potential toxicity of P. parvum. The growth rate of R. salina was negatively affected by cell-free filtrates but the effect of P. parvum predation was greater. Rotifers fed on both toxic and non-toxic algae, indicating that they did not select against the toxic alga. The P. parvum cell-free filtrate had an effect on B. plicatilis, although this was weak. B. plicatilis was also indirectly affected by P. parvum due to the negative effects of the toxic alga on their prey (R. salina). However, the greatest negative effect of P. parvum on the rotifers was due to ingestion of the toxic cells. Therefore, the phytoplankton competitor R. salina is more affected by P. parvum predation and the grazer B. plicatilis is more affected by ingestion of the toxic cells, the effects of excreted compounds being secondary. KEY WORDS: Haptophytes · Prymnesium parvum · Nutrient limitation · Toxicity · Haemolytic activity · Allelopathy · Rotifers · Zooplankton · Phytoplankton Full article in pdf format PreviousNextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in AME Vol. 38, No. 3. Online publication date: March 18, 2005 Print ISSN: 0948-3055; Online ISSN: 1616-1564 Copyright © 2005 Inter-Research.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.