Relative efficacy of veria and mastoidectomy techniques of cochlear implantation in preservation of sound-induced saccular responses

Abstract

Objective Cochlear implantation (CI) is a safe technique to give hearing sensation to a person with hearing impairment. The present study aimed to compare the two surgical approaches of CI, mastoidectomy and veria, for their effects on saccular function assessed using cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP). Design Multiple group time series design. Study sample The study included 63 children (3–8 years old) who underwent CI using veria technique (n = 20) and mastoidectomy approach (n = 43). The 500-Hz tone-burst evoked cVEMP were recorded on three occasions- a day before CI surgery, a day after the device switch-on and 4 months after the switch-on. Results The post-implant results revealed the absence of cVEMP in nearly 40% of the participants. The amplitudes were significantly lower at the time of the switch-on and at the 4-months follow-up period (p < 0.05). Among the participants undergoing CI using mastoidectomy approach, amplitudes were significantly larger after surgery than those undergoing surgery using veria technique (p < 0.05). Conclusions The saccular responses are better preserved with the mastoidectomy technique than the veria technique for CI surgery.