Abstract
Summary The relative contributions of different sources of variance to ratings of confidence were studied. Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) stories for 46 male students were rated by four TAT experts with regard to 16 personality variables. The judges gave also a confidence rating for each personality rating. A three-way analysis of variance was applied, and the relative magnitude of the different variance sources was estimated. The main sources (Subjects, Judges, Variables) contributed together only about 10% of the total variance, whereas the different interactions plus the residual accounted for the rest.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
