Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify variables, aside from curriculum and instruction, that make a contribution to the effectiveness of special education resource room instruction. Of particular interest was whether different approaches to teachers use of progress monitoring data related to differences in achievement. A total of 343 students identified as learning disabled by their schools from grades one through six within 35 schools in a large city school district participated. Results of descriptive and regression analyses revealed students with learning disabilities made progress in reading proficiency. The results of this investigation implied that one non-alterable variable—initial level of performance—and one alterable variable—instructional group size—were the two factors consistently related to student reading progress. Although no achievement differences were obtained related to the data utilization approach used, frequency of instructional changes was related to the approach for evaluating progress data. Implications for monitoring student progress in reference to alterable and unalterable elements of instruction are considered.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.