Abstract
Studies evaluating the relative importance of the upper and lower canaliculi in tear drainage have been many and varied, and at times the application of the data to clinical situations is difficult. In order to evaluate the relative tear flow in the upper and lower canaliculi and to quantitatively evaluate the different tear flow rates by a physiologic method, we have studied 11 patients using partial canalicular obstructions and dacryoscintigraphy. The authors found no statistical difference in tear flow between the upper and lower canalicular systems. This information has clinical application when deciding whether to repair an isolated canalicular injury.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
