Abstract

ALMOST all of the data presented in the literature indicate equal utilization of the d- and l- isomers of methionine. This subject was recently reviewed by Marrett et al. (1964). The relative utilization of dl-methionine and Methionine Hydroxy Analogue (MHA) is much more controversial than that of the activity of the d- and l- forms of methionine. Bird (1952) found MHA to be equal to dl-methionine in supporting performance of chicks when fed on an equimolar basis. Gordon and Sizer (1955) reported that MHA had equal activity to l-methionine and was more active than dl or d-methionine when added on an equimolar basis to a sulfur amino acid deficient chick diet. Sullivan and Bird (1957) compared MHA and dl-methionine on an equimolar basis in 12 and 14% protein chick diets and found the analogue failed by a wide margin to support performance equivalent to dl-methionine. The addition of either urea…

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.