Abstract

Background: The oral antidepressant venlafaxine hydrochloride is a selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of a new generic formulation of venlafaxine extended-release 75-mg capsules (test) and the available branded formulation (reference) to comply with regulatory criteria for marketing of the test product in Brazil. Methods: This single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, 2-period crossover study was conducted in healthy male volunteers and consisted of separate fast- ing and fed phases. A single oral dose of the test or reference formulation was followed by a 7-day washout period, after which subjects received the alternative formulation. There was a 3-month interval between the fasting and fed portions of the study. There was no standardization of race because of the difficulty of achieving standardization in the Brazilian population. Blood samples were collected before dosing and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after dosing. Venlafaxine concentrations were determined using an HPLC-MS/MS method. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios (test:reference) for C max and AUC 0−t were within the regulatory range of 80% to 125%. Adverse events were monitored through-out the study based on vital signs, laboratory tests, interviews, and spontaneous patient reports. Results: Forty-eight subjects were enrolled in both phases of the study; all 48 subjects completed the fasting phase, and 1 subject withdrew during the fed phase. The mean (SD) age of participants in the fasting and fed phases was 24.96 (5.5) and 24.90 (4.7) years, re- spectively; their mean weight was 69.65 (9.6) and 71.00 (10.6) kg and their mean height was 172.0 (6.9) and 173.0 (6.6) cm. Under fasting conditions, the arithmetic mean venlafaxine C max was 35.705 (23.946) ng/mL for the test formulation and 34.470 (20.639) ng/mL for the reference formulation, with a geometric mean ratio of 1.04. The arithmetic mean AUC 0−t for the respective formulations was 562.015 (481.875) and 508.509 (439.456) ng · h/mL, with a geometric mean ratio of 1.11. The arithmetic mean T max was 6.188 (1.560) and 5.885 (1.648) hours. Under fed conditions, the arithmetic mean venlafaxine C max was 42.892 (24.348) ng/mL for the test formulation and 46.275 (23.011) ng/mL for the reference formulation, with a geometric mean ratio of 0.93. The arithmetic mean AUC 0−t for the respective formulations was 737.218 (603.998) and 682.124 (524.713) ng · h/mL, with a geometric mean ratio of 1.08. The arithmetic mean T max was 6.787 (1.769) and 5.957 (1.661) hours. There were no significant increases in venlafaxine C max, AUC 0−t, or T max for either formulation in the fed phase compared with the fasting phase. In both the fasting and fed portions of the study, the 90% CIs for the ratio (test:reference) of log-transformed C max (fasting: 93.24–105.93; fed: 84.67–97.85) and AUC 0−t (fasting: 102.90–116.71; fed: 98.19–114.41) were within the acceptance range for bioequivalence. The most common adverse events (≥5% of subjects) in the fasting phase were nausea (46%), diarrhea (29%), headache (29%), vomiting (15%), and colic (6%); the most common adverse events in the fed phase were nausea (15%), headache (13%), and dizziness (9%). Conclusion: In this single-dose study in healthy fasting and fed volunteers, the test formulation of venlafaxine extended-release 75-mg capsules met Brazilian regulatory criteria for bioequivalence to the reference formulation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call