Abstract

Objective:To examine correlations among nuclear, architectural, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading systems, and their relationships with lymph node (LN) involvement in endometrioid endometrial cancer.Material and Methods:Histopathology slides of 135 consecutive patients were reviewed with respect to tumor grade and LN metastasis. Notable nuclear atypia was defined as grade 3 nuclei. FIGO grade was established by raising the architectural grade (AG) by one grade when the tumor was composed of cells with nuclear grade (NG) 3. Correlations between the grading systems were analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients, and relationships of grading systems with LN involvement were assessed using logistic regression analysis.Results:Correlation analysis revealed a significant and strongly positive relationship between FIGO and architectural grading systems (r=0.885, p=0.001); however, correlations of nuclear grading with the architectural (r=0.535, p=0.165) and FIGO grading systems (r=0.589, p=0.082) were moderate and statistically non-significant. Twenty-five (18.5%) patients had LN metastasis. LN involvement rates differed significantly between tumors with AG 1 and those with AG 2, and tumors with FIGO grade 1 and those with FIGO grade 2. In contrast, although the difference in LN involvement rates failed to reach statistical significance between tumors with NG 1 and those with NG 2, it was significant between NG 2 and NG 3 (p=0.042). Although all three grading systems were associated with LN involvement in univariate analyses, an independent relationship could not be established after adjustment for other confounders in multivariate analysis.Conclusion:Nuclear grading is significantly correlated with neither architectural nor FIGO grading systems. The differences in LN involvement rates in the nuclear grading system reach significance only in the setting of tumor cells with NG 3; however, none of the grading systems was an independent predictor of LN involvement.

Highlights

  • Endometrioid-type endometrial cancer (EC) is graded histologically according to the criteria set forth by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) [1]

  • FIGO stated that in tumors with notable nuclear atypia that is inappropriate for the architectural grade (AG), the final grade should be established by raising the AG by one grade [3]

  • By using strict diagnostic criteria, we aimed to examine correlations among the nuclear, architectural, and FIGO grading systems, and their relationships with lymph node (LN) involvement in endometrioid-type EC

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Endometrioid-type endometrial cancer (EC) is graded histologically according to the criteria set forth by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) [1]. This grading system consists of a combination of two different grading systems, architectural grading and nuclear grading. In the FIGO grading system, features for architectural grading have been adopted from well-defined criteria of the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) pathology committee [2]. FIGO did not define any criteria to determine “notable nuclear atypia”, which led to confusion both for pathologists and physicians. The abstract of this study was accepted as a poster presentation at the 20th International Meeting of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO 2017); November 4-7, 2017; Vienna, Austria

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call