Relationships between trans-10 shift indicators and milk fat traits in dairy ewes: Insights into milk fat depression

Abstract

The causative relationship between ruminal biohydrogenation alterations known as the trans-10 shift and marine lipid-induced milk fat depression (MFD) has been questioned in dairy ewes, but the large intra- and inter-experiment differences in the levels of trans-10 shift indicators precludes firm conclusions. This meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the relationship between trans-10 shift milk indicators [i.e., trans-10,cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), trans-10 18:1 or trans-10:trans-11 18:1 ratio] and lactation performance, mainly milk fat traits, in Assaf dairy ewes. A database comprising of 17 experiments including 50 dietary treatments was compiled. The diets were grouped into 2 dietary conditions: (1) non-MFD condition, which included 14 diets supplemented with plant oils and tannins that modified the milk fatty acid profile without lowering milk fat concentration and yield, and 12 respective control diets, and (2) MFD condition, which included 15 diets supplemented with marine lipids that induced the low fat-milk syndrome, and 9 respective control diets. The overall levels of milk trans-10 shift indicators did not differ between dietary conditions, but significant increments were found in the supplemented diets relative to their respective controls. A similar linear and negative (slope: −7.28 ± 2.816) relationship between milk fat concentration and trans-10,cis-12 CLA was found in both dietary conditions. However, the quadratic negative response of milk fat content to trans-10 18:1 concentration was greater in MFD than in non-MFD conditions. In the two dietary conditions, the relationship between milk trans-10,cis-12 CLA or trans-10 18:1 and de novo fatty acid concentration in milk was negative, whereas the relationship with preformed fatty acid proportion was positive. The magnitude of changes in both milk fatty acid groups in response to changes in these trans-10 shift indicators were greater in non-MFD compared with MFD conditions. Milk fat yield and trans-10 shift indicators were only negatively related in ewes that were fed marine lipid supplements, because reductions in de novo fatty acid yield with increased shift indicator levels were not counteracted by concomitant increments in preformed fatty acid secretion. The best-fit (lower root mean squared error, higher R2 and no prediction biases) equations of milk fat or major milk fatty acid groups, as concentration or yield, were based on milk trans-10 18:1 concentration. In conclusion, different responses between the two conditions to similar shift indicator levels support that the trans-10 shift would not be a major factor explaining the diet-induced low-fat milk syndrome in dairy ewes.