Abstract
A model of relationships among 4 cognitive components (working memory, representation, metacognition, and performance) implicated in the acquisition and transfer of Logo was developed and tested. Two implementations of mediated instruction, one of which involved a macrocontext (Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, 1990), also were compared with respect to these 4 components and to measures of transfer. Few reliable differences were found between instructional conditions, indicating that our systematic mediation of Logo learning was equally effective whether presented with or without the larger framework of a macrocontext. Path analysis of correlations among the 4 cognitive components and a series of transfer tasks indicated that transfer was regulated by a system of relationships among the cognitive components
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
