RELATIONSHIP OF THE GRIESS NITRITE TEST TO BACTERIAL CULTURE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF URINARY TRACT INFECTION

Abstract

Article1 January 1961RELATIONSHIP OF THE GRIESS NITRITE TEST TO BACTERIAL CULTURE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF URINARY TRACT INFECTIONLEON G. SMITH, M.D., WALTER R. THAYER, M.D., ELLI M. MALTA, JOHN P. UTZ, M.D.LEON G. SMITH, M.D.Search for more papers by this author, WALTER R. THAYER, M.D.Search for more papers by this author, ELLI M. MALTASearch for more papers by this author, JOHN P. UTZ, M.D.Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-54-1-66 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail ExcerptInterest has been renewed periodically in the Griess nitrite reaction as a means of detecting bacterial infection in urine.1-4 Although it was originally employed as a test of bacterial contamination of water,5 its application as an indicator of bacteriuria was suggested by the finding that most of the bacterial species which cause urinary tract infection reduce nitrate to nitrite.In vitro studies by Kahler and Guze6have revealed that sodium nitrite in concentrations of as little as 0.1 μg. per milliliter gives a positive test. However, considerable periods of time were required for nitrate reduction by certain strains of bacteria....Bibliography1. WeltmannHaslinger OK: Die Nitritreaktion im Harn als der Harninfektion, Ztschr. f. urol. Chir. 18: 73-85, 1925. Google Scholar2. VaradySzanto JG: Untersuchungen über den Nitritgehalt des Speichels des Magensaftes und des Harnes, Klin. Wchnschr. 19: 200-203 (Mar. 2) 1940. CrossrefGoogle Scholar3. BechgaardJansen PKF: Nitritreaktion ved Urnvejsinfektion, Nord. med. 20: 2134-2136 (Dec. 4) 1943. Google Scholar4. Schaus R: Griess' nitrite test in diagnosis of urinary infection, J. A. M. A. 161: 528-529 (June 9) 1956. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Griess P: Bemerkungen zur Abhandlung der H. H. Weselsky und Benedickt: "Ueber einige Azoverbindungen," Berichteder deutsch. chem. gesllsch. 12: 426-428 (Mar.) 1879. CrossrefGoogle Scholar6. KahlerGuze RLLB: Evaluation of the Griess nitrite test as a method for the recognition of urinary tract infection, J. Lab. Clin. Med. 49: 934-937 (June) 1957. MedlineGoogle Scholar7. Feigl F: Spot tests in inorganic analysis, 5th Ed., 1958, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, p. 330. Google Scholar This content is PDF only. To continue reading please click on the PDF icon. Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: Bethesda, Maryland*Received for publication April 25, 1960.From the Infectious Disease Service, Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; from the Employee Health Service; and from the Clinical Pathology Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Public Health Service, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Bethesda, Maryland.Requests for reprints should be addressed to John P. Utz, M.D., Chief, Infectious Disease Service, Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda 14, Maryland.*All examinations of urine except the Griess tests were performed by the Clinical Pathology staff of the Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. All studies were performed during 1958 and, with infrequent exception, the large series of specimens were consecutive accessions to the laboratory. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited byAmpli: A Construction Set for Paperfluidic SystemsEnzymatic Methods Used for DiagnosisScreening for Bacteriuria in Japanese School ChildrenA modified nitrite test as a screening test for significant bacteriuriaUrinary Tract InfectionEvaluation of a New Commercial Kit (UROBACT) for Detection of BacteriuriaUrinalysisClinical evaluation of three rapid methods for the detection of significant bacteriuriaRapid detection of significant bacteriuria by use of an automated Limulus amoebocyte lysate assayScreening for bacteriuria of schoolchildren by the nitrite reactionQuantitative urine culture by reagent strip incubationRapid Bacteriological Identification of UropathogensA New Office Test for BacteriuriaUrine Culture: Search for an Effective Office Screening TechniqueLaboratory Diagnosis of Urinary Tract InfectionMass detection of bacteriuria by combination of two screening testsDetection of bacteriuria in childrenA “stick Test” for Detection of Asymptomatic BacteriuriaA simplified accurate method for detecting bacteriuriaA New Test for the Detection of BacteriuriaPyelonephritis und chronische interstitielle NephritisPyelonephritisScreening for asymptomatic bacteriuria during antepartum careSCREENING FOR SIGNIFICANT ASYMPTOMATIC BACTERIURIA BY A SIMPLE CULTURE METHOD: A Pilot Study on 1136 ChildrenA simplified technique for determining significant colony counts in urineTHE INCIDENCE OF URINARY INFECTION IN 5000 PREGNANT WOMENA ROUTINE PROCEDURE FOR THE DETECTION OF BACTERIURIA IN PREGNANCYQuantitative Bacterial Culture of UrineTHE VALUE OF A CHEMICAL SCREENING TEST FOR URINARY INFECTIONINFECTION OF THE URINARY TRACT IN PREGNANCY: AN INVESTIGATION OF A NEW ROUTINE IN ANTENATAL CAREA study of two screening techniques in the school health serviceBacteriology and Immune Response in Urinary Tract InfectionsLe complicanze infettive del diabeteASYMPTOMATIC BACTERIURIA IN PREGNANCYThe Detection of Significant BacteriuriaDie Bedeutung der Griessschen Nitritprobe bei HarnwegsinfektionenTROPICAL CARDIOMYOPATHYWORKERS NEARING RETIREMENTA TEST FOR BACTERIURIAA SIMPLE TEST FOR SIGNIFICANT BACTERIURIABACILLURIA IN PREGNANCY 1 January 1961Volume 54, Issue 1Page: 66-72KeywordsClinical pathologyInfectious diseasesMedical servicesNitratesPrevention, policy, and public healthResearch laboratoriesSodiumUrinary tract infectionsUrine ePublished: 1 December 2008 Issue Published: 1 January 1961 PDF downloadLoading ...