Abstract
Occupational health scholars have intensively speculated on the connection between occupational stress and the Type-A Behavioral Pattern. A wide variety of models investigating the underlying relationship between stressors, Type-A, ways of coping and stress symptoms have been tested and data seems to support those that describe a more direct connection between the four. Romanian adapted version of ASSET (A Shortened Stress Evaluation Tool, Cooper & Cartwright, 2002) has been used to measure eight sources of occupational stress, and four dimensions considered to rather be effects of work stress. The Romanian adapted version of SWS (Survey of Work Styles, Jackson & Gray, 1988) was used to measure six dimensions of the TABP from an organizational perspective. A set of N=109 valid parallel data was eventually analyzed searching for (a) relationships between the work stress and TABP dimensions and (b) significant differences between TABPs and TBBPs in terms of levels of work stress. Implications of the results are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
