Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aims to systematically review original articles investigating the link between spectral acoustic measures in healthy talkers and perceived speech intelligibility, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-two studies were retained. Eighteen papers investigated vowel acoustics, one studied glides and eight articles investigated consonants, mostly sibilants. Various spectral measures and intelligibility estimates were used. The following measures were shown to be linked to sub-lexical perceived speech intelligibility ratings: for vowels, steady-state F1 and F2 measures, the F1 range, the [i]-[U] F2 difference, F0-F1 and F1-F2 differences in [è-A] and [q-è], the vowel space area, the mean amount of formant movement, the vector length and the spectral change measure; for consonants, the centroid energy and the spectral peak in the [s]-sound, as well as the steady-state F1 offset frequency in vowels preceding [t] and [d].To conclude, as speech is highly variable even in healthy adult speakers, a better understanding of the imprecisions in healthy spontaneous speech will provide a more realistic baseline for the investigation of disordered speech. To date, no acoustic measure is able to predict speech intelligibility to a large extent. There is still extensive research to be carried out to identify relevant acoustic combinations that could account for perceived speech variations (e.g. vowel and consonant reductions) and to gather normative data from a large number of healthy speakers. To that end, speech-related terms (e.g. intelligibility, comprehensibility, severity) need to be clearly defined and methodologies described in sufficient details to allow for replication, cross-comparisons/meta-analyses and pooling of data. .

Highlights

  • Speech is an essential function in everyday life that requires complex interactions between the generation of air pressure, the vibration of the vocal folds, and the modulation by the resonating cavities of the phonatory tract (Fitch, 2000; Honda, 2008)

  • It is of paramount importance to get a good understanding of these strategies, to distinguish which variations can be attributed to the constraints of spontaneous speech in a natural communication context, and which deviations indicate disordered speech, to allow for a more accurate assessment

  • We have introduced the interest of focusing on the behaviour of segmental spectral measures in healthy speech before using these objective intelligibility measures in specific speech-disordered populations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Speech is an essential function in everyday life that requires complex interactions between the generation of air pressure, the vibration of the vocal folds, and the modulation by the resonating cavities of the phonatory tract (Fitch, 2000; Honda, 2008). Some healthy talkers are more intelligible than others, which was shown to be linked to the speaker’s acoustic-phonetic production rather than to the listener’s perception (Bond & Moore, 1994; Cox, Alexander, & Gilmore, 1987; Hazan & Markham, 2004; Hood & Poole, 1980). The analysis of speech ‘errors’ often leads to the welldocumented speed-accuracy trade-off (Guenther, 1995; Meunier, 2007; Tremblay, Sato, & Deschamps, 2017). To understand this trade-off, Lindblom proposed the ‘hyper/hypo-speech’ (‘H&H’) theory (Bond & Moore, 1994; Lindblom, 1990), which posits that high intelligibility can be reached through different acoustic-phonetic strategies (Cox et al, 1987; Guenther, 1995; Hazan & Markham, 2004; Lavoie, 2002). It is of paramount importance to get a good understanding of these strategies, to distinguish which variations can be attributed to the constraints of spontaneous speech in a natural communication context, and which deviations indicate disordered speech, to allow for a more accurate assessment

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call