Abstract

Abstract Background: The relationship between neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in peripheral blood and prognosis after castration therapy for prostate cancer remains unclear. Methods: A total of 186 patients with prostate cancer treated between January 2018 and March 2021 were selected as the study subjects. All patients underwent castration therapy. Patient follow-up records for 2 years were examined to assess progression-free survival. NLR, PLR, and PSA levels were measured in the participants’ blood. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors affecting the occurrence of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to analyze progression-free survival, and ROC curves were plotted to assess the predictive value of NLR and PLR for progression-free survival. Results: In the stable group, NLR, PLR, PSA levels, bone metastasis ratio, and Gleason score ≥8 were significantly lower than in the progression group. T3 stage, N0 stage, and M0 stage were significantly higher in the progression group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). NLR, PLR, and PSA levels were all significantly linearly correlated (P < 0.05). High NLR, high PLR, high PSA, high bone metastasis, Gleason score <8, T3 stage, and N0 stage were independent risk factors for poor prognosis after castration therapy for prostate cancer, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Patients with low NLR had significantly better progression-free survival than the high NLR group, and patients with low PLR had significantly better progression-free survival than the high PLR group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). The area under the curve for NLR and PLR in predicting progression-free survival after castration therapy for prostate cancer was both greater than 0.90, indicating high clinical utility. Conclusion: Peripheral blood NLR and PLR after castration therapy for prostate cancer are highly correlated with patient prognosis quality and can serve as important potential indicators for predicting patient prognosis quality.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.