Abstract

This study evaluated the relationship between abiotic flow characteristics and habitat quality. Habitat quality was assessed using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology (IFIM), which uses bioindication. Brown trout was selected as a bioindicator because of its sensitivity to morphological changes and its occurrence in sufficient reference reaches. The correlation between the morphological characteristics of the stream and the area-weighted suitability (AWS), which represents habitat quality, was evaluated. Fifty-nine reference reaches of fifty-two mountain and piedmont streams in Slovakia were analysed. The correlation analysis demonstrated the strongest relationship between the AWS and the stream depth and width. The relationship between the water surface area and the AWS indicated that, for mountain streams, there is a significantly increasing trend of the AWS value with increasing surface area. Considering piedmont streams, the AWS variation with a change in the water-surface area was minimal. These results can form the basis for deriving regression equations to determine habitat quality. Such a procedure can significantly simplify the evaluation of the quality of aquatic habitat, making it much more accessible for design practice.

Highlights

  • IntroductionCompared with a natural river, a regulated riverbed is monotonous in shape

  • The need to address fundamental research questions leading to advances in related science and key management issues has led to the establishment of the scientific discipline ecohydraulics [1] that brings together biologists, ecologists, fluvial geomorphologists, sedimentologists, hydrologists, hydraulic and river engineers, and water resource managers.A practical example of alternative urban stream channel designs influencing ecohydraulic conditions has been described by Anim et al [2]

  • The results showed that: (i) with the addition of natural oscillations to an increasing number of individual topographic variables in a degraded channel, the ecohydraulic conditions were incrementally improved and (ii) the channel reconfiguration reduced the excessive frequency of bed mobility, loss of habitat, and hydraulic diversity, as more topographic variables were added

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Compared with a natural river, a regulated riverbed is monotonous in shape Such regulated streams do not provide a suitable habitat for a wider range of animals, especially fish. The geometry of the riverbed affects the hydraulic characteristics of the stream, which affects the diversity of the velocity field and the sediment regime, diversity of the riverbed, and a wide range of abiotic and biotic flow characteristics. This relationship can be modelled, which allows a qualitatively higher level for a wide range of water management activities. Habitat modelling in fish ecology [8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call