Abstract

The aim of study was comparison of results of carotids sinus massage (CSM) and adenosine test (AT) in patients with syncope diagnosed by head-up tilt test (HUTT). We observed 169 pts (81 men, 88 women) aged 18-58 yrs (x38,2 yrs) with syncope referred to HUTT. All pts underwent standard HUTT (HUTT-s) acc. To Westminster protocol. Additional tilt with isoproterenol infusion (HUTT-I) was preformed in pts with negative HUTT-s. HUTT was assessed as positive if reproduced symptoms referred by patients. Carotid sinus massage and rapid IV injection of 12 mg of adenosine were done in all pts. RR pauses > 6s induced by adenosine injection or RR pause > 3 s and/or blood pressure fall induced by CSM were assumed as positive tests results. 16 pts (9,5%) had positive AT and 18 pts (10,6%) had positive CSM. Positive AT was observed in 10% pts with negative HUTT-s; in no pts with positive HUTT-s, in 23,1 % of pts with negative HUTT-I and in 8% of positive HUTT-I Positive CSM was observed in 20% pts with negative HUTT-s; in 13,3% pts with positive HUTT-s, in no pts with negative HUTT-I and in 8% of positive HUTT-I Carotid sinus hypersensitivity was no more frequently observed in patients with positive HUTT-I than in positive HUTT-s. Positive AT results were more frequent in pts with negative results of HUTT (both HUTT-s and HUTT-I) Carotid sinus hypersensitivity as a kind of neurocardiogenic syncope seems to have different mechanism than vaso-vagal syncope. HUTT-I rather do not induce syncope by carotid hypersensitivity mechanism. Adenosine may by useful in the diagnosis of syncope in patients with negative results of head-up tilt test.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call