Abstract
Two methods for estimating pulmonary diffusing capacity (steady-state O2 method of Lilienthal and Riley and steady-state CO method of Filley) were compared by applying them simultaneously in three normal young men at different levels of treadmill exercise with and without hypoxia. Cardiac output (indicator dilution) was estimated at the same time. Subjects were studied at each of four levels of exercise producing oxygen uptakes between 1 and 2 frac12/l/min. and cardiac outputs between 9 and 22 l/min. Diffusing capacity for CO increased progressively with increasing exercise in all subjects. It was higher during hypoxia than during air-breathing at the same level of exercise, as were total ventilation, tidal volume and cardiac output. This increase in Dco cannot be explained solely on the basis of increased affinity of hemoglobin for CO during hypoxia. Diffusing capacity for oxygen increased progressively until the cardiac output reached about 15/l/min. but did not increase significantly with further increase in cardiac output. The reasons for the difference in the shape of the curve of diffusing capacity versus cardiac output in the case of CO as opposed to O2 remain obscure but are believed to be related primarily to differences in the weighting of the many factors involved. Submitted on April 24, 1958
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.