Abstract
Phytoplankton contribute half of the primary production in the biosphere and are the major source of energy for the Arctic Ocean ecosystem. While primary production measurements are therefore fundamental to our understanding of marine biogeochemical cycling, the extent to which current methods provide a definitive estimate of this process remains uncertain given differences in their underlying approaches and assumptions. This is especially the case in the Arctic Ocean, a region of the planet undergoing rapid evolution as a result of climate change, yet where primary production measurements are sparse. In this study, we compared three common methods for estimating primary production in the European Arctic Ocean: 1) production of 18O-labeled oxygen (GPP-18O), 2) changes in dissolved oxygen (GPP-DO) and 3) incorporation rates of 14C-labelled carbon into particulate organic carbon (14C-POC) and into total organic carbon (14C-TOC, the sum of dissolved and particulate organic carbon). Results show that primary production rates derived using oxygen methods showed good agreement across season and were strongly positively correlated. While also strongly correlated, higher scatter associated with seasonal changes was observed between 14C-POC and 14C-TOC. The 14C-TOC-derived rates were, on average, approximately 50 % of the oxygen-based estimates. However, the relationship between these estimates changed seasonally. In May, during a spring bloom of Phaeocystis sp., 14C-TOC was 52 % and 50 % of GPP-DO and GPP-18O respectively, while in August, during post-bloom conditions dominated by flagellates, 14C-TOC was 125 % of GPP-DO and 14C-TOC was 175 % of GPP-18O. Varying relationship between C and O rates may be the result of varying importance of respiration, where C-based rates estimate Net Primary Production (NPP) and O-based rates estimate Gross Primary Production (GPP).However, uncertainty remains in this comparison, given differing assumptions of the methods and the photosynthetic quotients.The median O:C ratio of 4.75 in May is within the range of that observed for other regions of the world’s ocean. However, the median O:C ratio for August is < 1, lower than in any other reported region. Our results suggest further research is needed to estimate O:C in Arctic waters, and at different times of the seasonal cycle.
Highlights
Plankton photosynthesis contributes half of the primary production (PP) in the biosphere (Field et al, 1998) and is the main source of carbon for the Arctic Ocean food web (Matrai et al, 2013)
We report on rates of PP derived using 14C, Dissolved Oxygen, and 18O methods in the northwestern Svalbard Archipelago in the European Arctic and focus on comparing these rates
Seawater for PP analysis was sampled from the same cast at four stations (D1 and D6 in both May and August), while logistical constraints on hydrographic deployments forced collection of water from separate CTD casts at three stations (P1, P3, and P4) in May and two stations (P5 and P7) in August, with time lag between casts ranging from minutes to 32 h
Summary
Plankton photosynthesis contributes half of the primary production (PP) in the biosphere (Field et al, 1998) and is the main source of carbon for the Arctic Ocean food web (Matrai et al, 2013). Measurements of PP over the last decades, both remote and in situ, have provided critical insight into the spatial and temporal variability of phytoplankton growth in the Arctic. While recent modeling and remote sensing studies have suggested climate-driven changes in the rates of PP in the Arctic (Pabi et al, 2008; Slagstad et al, 2015; Kahru, 2017), methodological differences in PP measurements introduce uncertainty in these future projections. Until a consensus is reached or an unambiguous method is developed, comparisons between measurements originating from different methods can provide insight on the ecological and physiological processes involved as well as help constrain the uncertainties (Robinson et al, 2009; Regaudie-de-Gioux et al, 2014)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.