Abstract

Brain structure and learning capacities both vary with experience, but the mechanistic link between them is unclear. Here, we investigated whether experience-dependent variability in learning performance can be explained by neuroplasticity in foraging honey bees. The mushroom bodies (MBs) are a brain center necessary for ambiguous olfactory learning tasks such as reversal learning. Using radio frequency identification technology, we assessed the effects of natural variation in foraging activity, and the age when first foraging, on both performance in reversal learning and on synaptic connectivity in the MBs. We found that reversal learning performance improved at foraging onset and could decline with greater foraging experience. If bees started foraging before the normal age, as a result of a stress applied to the colony, the decline in learning performance with foraging experience was more severe. Analyses of brain structure in the same bees showed that the total number of synaptic boutons at the MB input decreased when bees started foraging, and then increased with greater foraging intensity. At foraging onset MB structure is therefore optimized for bees to update learned information, but optimization of MB connectivity deteriorates with foraging effort. In a computational model of the MBs sparser coding of information at the MB input improved reversal learning performance. We propose, therefore, a plausible mechanistic relationship between experience, neuroplasticity, and cognitive performance in a natural and ecological context.

Highlights

  • A central tenet of contemporary behavioural neuroscience is that there is a bidirectional relationship between experience and brain structure

  • Bees that began foraging when less than 14 days old as adult were classified as precocious foragers [34]

  • We show that a reduced number of synaptic boutons in the mushroom bodies (MBs) neuropil following orientation flights is associated with improved performance in reversal learning (Figs 3 and 4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A central tenet of contemporary behavioural neuroscience is that there is a bidirectional relationship between experience and brain structure. Experience and learning change brain structure by neuroplasticity, and structural changes to the brain have consequences for information processing and thereby further experience and learning [1,2,3,4]. Several classic studies have contributed evidence to this tenet [5,6,7,8,9], but few studies have shown both how experience changes brain microstructure and the consequences of these changes for cognitive function [2]. Cognition and brain plasticity in foraging bees. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call