Abstract

Market orientation and innovation orientation, including their relationship with firm performance, are well-debated in prevailing marketing literature. Interestingly, relationship orientation, as an extension of market orientation, is yet to be subjected to similar investigation. While relationship orientation suggests that firms should invest in building relationships with clients and suppliers to generate improved financial performance, innovation orientation proposes that customers will prefer superior and innovative products/services and it supports a learning philosophy. Torn between two shores, the result is often that practitioners are confused as to what the desired orientation for the firm should be. This paper considers the relationship of both orientations with firm performance in business-to-business (B2B) markets simultaneously, and in particular examines the mediating effect of innovation on the relationship orientation-firm performance relationship. By employing published scales for innovation and relationship orientation, cross-sectional data were collected from 181 business-to-business managers in South African firms. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test for scale reliability and validity, while the hypothesized relationships between constructs were considered through structural equation modelling and partial least squares analysis. The paper provides valuable insights for measuring these constructs in an emerging market context and suggests a balanced approach to adopting these strategic orientations in B2B markets. The results suggest that practitioners and researchers should pay attention to both orientations simultaneously, because jointly they are associated with better firm performance.

Highlights

  • IntroductionSince Miles and Snow (1978) introduced their typology of four strategic orientations, various alternative approaches to strategic orientation (including market orientation, product orientation, customer orientation, innovation orientation, relationship orientation, stakeholder orientation and interaction orientation) have emerged

  • Since Miles and Snow (1978) introduced their typology of four strategic orientations, various alternative approaches to strategic orientation have emerged

  • H9: There is a significant difference in firm performance between the strategic archetypes as defined by relationship orientation and innovation orientation. *structural equation modelling (SEM) = Structural Equation Modelling (Jöreskog and Sörbom, 1999a) **partial least squares (PLS) = Partial Least Squares (Ringle et al, 2005) *** ANOVA = Analysis of Variance(Palant, 2007)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since Miles and Snow (1978) introduced their typology of four strategic orientations, various alternative approaches to strategic orientation (including market orientation, product orientation, customer orientation, innovation orientation, relationship orientation, stakeholder orientation and interaction orientation) have emerged. This paper seeks to contribute to this void in the literature by considering innovation and relationship orientation simultaneously, and to test their relationship with firm performance. The paper offers literature support for the relationship between innovation orientation and firm performance, as well as the link between relationship orientation and performance. This approach assists in the identification of the constructs to be included in the study and facilitates the motivation for considering innovation and relationship orientation simultaneously. This theorisation resulted in the formulation of nine hypotheses. We provide a summary of the methodology and proceed to report the results of a survey conducted amongst 181 business-to-business managers in a South African context

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call