Abstract
Procrastination is a complex problem that can be defined as delaying an intended course of action (despite anticipating adverse consequences). Even when some students have equivalent motivation and skill levels, they tend to procrastinate more frequently than others. Approaches that analyze whether contextual influences may prevent or promote dysregulation processes associated with procrastination are scarce. According to Self-Determination Theory, contextual influences can facilitate self-regulated motivation (e.g., autonomous pursuit of interests or personal goals), if teaching style is autonomy-supportive and guarantees the satisfaction of students’ basic psychological needs for perceived competence, autonomy, and relatedness. Contrariwise, school context can also impede the development of autonomous motivation if teachers frustrate the satisfaction of their students’ psychological needs by recurring to controlling teaching behaviors, such as controlling use of rewards, negative conditional regard, excessive personal control, or intimidation. The goal of the present study was to assess the relations between controlling and autonomy-supportive teaching behaviors, psychological needs satisfaction (of the needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness), and four distinct measures of procrastination: general procrastination, decisional procrastination, procrastination linked to task avoidance, and pure procrastination. Data based on public university undergraduate students (N = 672) shows that controlling teaching behaviors are associated negatively with psychological needs satisfaction and positively with procrastination. Contrariwise, autonomy-supportive teaching behaviors are positively associated with psychological needs satisfaction and negatively with procrastination. The data obtained is useful for suggesting new lines of research to study the link between contextual influences and the prevention of academic procrastination in view of Self-Determination Theory. Also, our results suggest new pedagogical approaches where teachers can create contextual conditions that help to prevent or reduce procrastinating tendencies.
Highlights
Procrastination is the delay in taking an intended course of action – despite anticipating adverse consequences
We explore two theoretically opposite teaching styles: controlling teaching style – known as the dark side of motivation, and autonomysupportive teaching style – referred to as the bright side of motivation (Haerens et al, 2015)
In the quest to learn more about the social context of procrastination, teaching style is a variable that deserves particular consideration
Summary
Procrastination is the delay in taking an intended course of action – despite anticipating adverse consequences. It is generally considered detrimental to subjective well-being, in addition to causing harm in the areas of physical, mental, economic and academic health (Klingsieck, 2013) These consequences have led to proposals for different ways of measuring procrastination and different kinds of intervention programs aimed at counteracting it Schouwenburg (2004) and Boldaji et al (2015). Research on the reasons for procrastination has been carried out from the perspectives of personality, education, clinical psychology and psychodynamics, though often unaccompanied by recommendations for intervention and, even when there are, these are planned from a specific perspective In this sense, an important limitation is that the interventions do not integrate complementary knowledge stemming from other orientations (Klingsieck, 2013), and there is a lack of contrasted knowledge about the proposed therapeutic interventions. These interventions mainly focus on the learning of time management strategies or on cognitive approaches (Klingsieck, 2013), which is due in part to the poor systematization of analysis and intervention and the practically null assessment of the interventions carried out
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.