Abstract
The efficiency of eight extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) extraction methods was compared on two different activated sludges. Three chemical methods (EDTA, formaldehyde + NaOH, glutaraldehyde), four physical methods (sonication, cation exchange resin, sonication + cation exchange resin, heating) and a control method (centrifugation alone) were tested. EPS quantities extracted were more greater for chemical methods than those for physical methods. For the chemical methods used EPS contamination due to extracting reagents was pointed out by infra-red analysis. The EPS extracted by physical methods can show a different qualitative composition with protein and carbohydrate as predominant compounds. This study therefore underlines that the choice of EPS extraction method should not only be limited to extraction yield and nucleic acid content but should also consider that the EPS solution may be contaminated by extracting reagents and/or be greatly modified by the extraction protocol.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
