Abstract

This paper explores relations between assemblages of carpological remains and vegetation in and around a small, shallow reservoir in southern Poland. The study was conducted from 2006 to 2008. Quantity and distribution of species in the reservoir were recorded annually during the growing season. In October 2008, 40 samples of surface sediment (top 2 cm) were collected along transects at 10 m intervals. Samples of 100 cm3 were prepared for analysis of plant macroremains. Assemblages of carpological remains generally reflect local vegetation well. In some cases, however, even analysis of numerous samples failed to fully capture the species composition or reflect plant ratios in the parent phytocenosis. Reasons for this include factors that affect seed production, transport and fossilization, which differ among species. Among the best-represented macroremains were plants of the rush phytocenosis. In analysed samples, macroremains of 68.8 % of extant rushes were identified. Sixty percent of submerged and floating-leaf taxa were found in carpological samples, whereas 26.7 % of the trees and bushes were represented in sediment deposits. Species composition of phytocenoses in the reservoir and in surrounding areas was best reflected by macroremains from the nearby reed bed. Numbers of diaspores of Mentha aquatica, Hippuris vulgaris and Carex reflected well their relative abundance in phytocenoses. Chara sp., Juncus inflexus and Eupatorium cannabinum were overrepresented, whereas Typha latifolia and Sparganium minimum were poorly represented in relation to contemporary plant cover. There were no diaspores of Phragmites australis, which dominates the contemporary reed bed. Besides the shape of a reservoir, the key factor influencing diaspore numbers is distribution of plant cover. In many cases, single diaspores (Potentilla erecta, Myosotis scorpioides, Lythrum salicaria, Scutellaria galericulata), or higher concentrations (Hippuris vulgaris, Mentha aquatica, Eleocharis palustris, Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani, Chara sp.) reflected well the location of parent vegetation. The findings indicate that carpological remains in sediments can be an important source of information about plants in and around lakes. They generally reflect well local vegetation and in some cases may be used to identify taxa that dominated in the past.

Highlights

  • Vegetation growing in and around reservoirs influences the entire aquatic ecosystem

  • Monitoring of the reservoir vegetation showed high stability of phytocenoses. This mainly refers to the reed bed habitat, where there was for the most part, no significant change in species composition for 3 years

  • The study showed that dispersion of diaspores in a very shallow reservoir was predominantly influenced by distribution of vegetation patches

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Vegetation growing in and around reservoirs influences the entire aquatic ecosystem. Plants provide habitat and are a main source of organic matter, trapping sediments and influencing the chemical composition of water (Barko and James 1998; Wetzel 2001). Use of plant macroremains for reconstructing species composition, establishing spatial distribution of phytocenoses and determining dominant species, requires knowledge of complex relations between macrofossil assemblages and contemporary vegetation (Birks 2001; Dieffenbacher-Krall 2007). Such studies of these relations employ samples from the topmost layer of bottom deposits (DieffenbacherKrall 2007) and permit better interpretation of macrofossil records (Zhao et al 2006).

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call