Abstract
The triple identification of fragments of the text, with the origin of the lessons identified from Justin, with Quinta hexaplaire and with the likely common origin of the Hebraisms, washingtonensis codices and ancient Coptic versions, reflects the high diffusion of the anonymous Palestinian recension. A literature review of is cited for the book of the Minor Prophets. We emerged as the most famous among the didas-blocks, Jews who outlined the work of Aquila. A question arises when Aquila started the review of the book of the Minor Prophets, which of the two Palestinian recensions he took as a basis: the one that hexaples attribute has Theodotion or the anonymous literature review? This chapter concludes that Jerome assigns identical lessons, five times, to Aquila and Quinta and between them. The original text of the chapter is in French.Keywords: Aquila; Coptic versions; Jerome; Justin; Minor Prophets; Quinta; Theodotion
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
