Abstract

Modern soil mechanics (geotechnical engineering) was developed as a branch of civil engineering from the 1920’s. While modern porous media physics was developed as a branch of physics and applied mathematics from roughly the same period of time. In soil mechanics the main concern is often on the deformations, resulting from mechanical, hydraulic or thermal actions. In application of porous media physics the main concern is historically on the flow part, putting less emphasis on the mechanical part. However, deformation and flow are highly linked processes, especially in unconsolidated porous media (soil). This paper makes some links between concepts used in porous media physics, like the effective medium theory, and concepts in soil mechanics, like choice of stress measures. As an example, it shows that the use of Terzaghi effective stress is a matter of choice and can be consistently used also for cases where other effective stress measures are used in literature, like Biot effective stress. The requirement, to be consistent, is that the state variables considered, at the constitutive level, includes all relevant variables.

Highlights

  • Geotechnical engineering is the part of civil engineering concerns about the hydro-mechanical behavior of soils

  • In water-saturated systems, the volumetric deformation of the system is directly linked with the ability of the porous system for draining/absorbing of water, the mass balance equation should be taken into account

  • For a non-linear, anisotropic and/or inelastic material response, it is more convenient to have an effective stress measure that is independent of response (Equation, 6), i.e., the Terzaghi effective stress definition and solid stress as the stress state variables for the mechanical constitutive model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Geotechnical engineering is the part of civil engineering concerns about the hydro-mechanical (or thermo-hydro mechanical) behavior of soils. The dry bulk compressibility derived from effective medium theory, which will be a function of mean (effective) stress and/or porosity (or void ratio) in addition to the contact stiffness (grain compressibility) of the Hertz-Mindlin model, seems to be relatively in line with the measured values from coursegraded soils (e.g., [14]).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call