Abstract

Literature about the fisher (Martes pennanti) contains the following contradictions: (1) the species is an old-growth specialist versus a forest generalist, and (2) it lives with marten (M. americana) with minimal interaction versus densities of the two species are inversely related. These contradictions beg the questions of what is fisher habitat and does habitat affect the interactions of the two Martes. These questions were examined by analyzing the distributions of fishers (n = 15,549) and martens (n = 40,516) harvested in Maine, 1980–1987. This period was chosen because it had relatively stable pelt prices that were believed to result in harvests reflecting population occurrences. The spatial distribution of mean harvests of fisher and marten were compared to each other, and to snowfall distribution and frequency throughout Maine, 1980–1987. Martens were common only in northwestern Maine and were associated with frequent (monthly [Formula: see text]) and deep (total monthly [Formula: see text]) snowfalls, December–March. Fishers were rare in northwestern Maine but were common throughout the rest of the state where snowfalls were less frequent. We hypothesize that regular accumulations of deep snow reduce the fisher's fitness (via decreasing recruitment, survival, or both), resulting in a low abundance in northwestern Maine. In addition, we hypothesize that martens are rare in southern Maine due to competition from a dense fisher population. These hypotheses were evaluated by looking at patterns in age and recruitment ratios of fishers (n = 2,706) and martens (n = 5,572) harvested in core and non-core habitats for each species, 1980–1984. We found low indices of fisher recruitment (P <0.001) in the marten's core habitat consistent with the hypothesis that deep and frequent snowfalls limit fishers. Few adult martens were harvested (P <0.001) in the core habitats of fisher, consistent with our hypothesis that high fisher densities limit marten populations. Assuming our hypothesis on fisher–snow relations is true, and given that canopy closure affects snow accumulation, fisher habitats deserve more consideration in forest management in regions with frequent powder-snowfalls, fragmented forests, or both. We acknowledge, however, that both of our hypotheses (i.e., snow limits fisher and fisher limit marten) need direct testing because association does not prove causation. Key words: fisher, forestry, habitat, interspecific relations, Maine, Martes pennanti, Martes americana, marten, snow

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call