Abstract
People mentally represent complex information in the form of schemas and often interpret ambiguous information in a schema-consistent manner. The present study examined the role of relational schemas in interpretations of ambiguous social stimuli. In a lexical decision task, 97 high- and low-self-esteem participants were primed with one of four types of words-acceptance, rejection, ambiguous, or non-social-and were then presented with four types of target words-acceptance, rejection, neutral, or nonwords. Results indicated that participants with low self-esteem responded more quickly to rejection targets when primed with rejection or ambiguous words than with acceptance words; the reactions of high-self-esteem participants were not affected by the primes. The results suggest that ambiguous social cues prime rejection-related thoughts for low-self-esteem individuals but not for high-self-esteem individuals.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
