Abstract
In this article, I call for engaging in the post-qualitative “turn” with a sense of relationality to the past; that is, a commitment to turning traditions with care. In doing so, I point to the situated and constructed nature of methodology, theory, and even the post-qualitative “turn.” I also offer several questions (or cautions) for the field of qualitative research to consider in moving toward what St. Pierre has called the “next next.” I conclude by highlighting the importance of defining post-qualitative inquiry in relational rather than oppositional ways.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
