Abstract

The correlation between the NSAr and the SNA angles was studied in two separate samples. The first sample consisted of twenty young adults with excellent Class I (Angle) occlusion and proportionate facial skeleton, and the second sample consisted of sixty-one children with Class II, Division 1 (Angle) malocclusion. In the excellent-occlusion group, the correlation between the angles was remarkably higher (−0.94) than it was in the malocclusion group (−0.57). In both groups, in only a small number of cases were the extents of the angles close to the intersection of the calculated mean values. In orthodontic diagnosis, treating the values of the NSAr and the SNA angles separately can be extremely misleading, just as the use of the sella-nasion plane as a sole reference plane can lead to diagnostic errors. Thus, the SNA angle should be used with special caution, and a differing reference plane such as, for example, the Frankfort plane, should be preferred.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.