Abstract

During development nerve fibers must establish precise connections with sensory organs. For example, in the adult mammal a single chorda tympani nerve fiber innervates receptive fields on the tongue that contain from one to several fungiform papillae and associated taste buds. However, there has been no developmental study to determine how taste receptive fields are established. We hypothesized that previously observed differences in development of taste responses to various salts' might relate to development of receptive fields. Therefore, the size and chemical response properties of receptive fields for single chorda tympani nerve fibers in sheep fetuses, perinatal animals, and lambs were determined. Seventy-four fibers were studied in 44 animals from three age groups: fetuses about 130 days of gestation (term = 147 days); perinatal animals (about one week before or after birth); lambs (about one to three months postnatal). A single chorda tympani fiber was dissected and the tongue was stimulated with 0.5 M NH,Cl, NaCl, and KCl to record salt taste responses. Then individual fungiform papillae were stimulated electrically with 5 microamps anodal current from a fine platinum probe to determine number of papillae innervated by the fiber. There was a broad range of receptive field sizes across age groups: for fetuses the range was 3 to 40 papillae per field, mean (SD) = 13 ( 10); for perinatal animals the range was 1 to 33 papillae, mean (SD) = 15 (9); for lambs the range was 2 to 29 papillae, mean (SD) = 11 (7). There was a significant difference in receptive field size across age groups with a median test (p < 0.10), and posttests indicated that lamb fields were smaller than perinatal fields. Not only were small fields observed more frequently in fibers in older animals, but also there was an increase in the proportion of fibers that responded with highest frequency to NaCl compared to NH,CI ( p = 0.06). Furthermore, receptive field size correlated negatively with the NaCl : NH,Cl response ratio. That is, smaller receptive fields had higher frequency

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.