Abstract
The medical profession is awakening to the fact that it has been made a cat's paw to rake out the proverbial chestnuts for the proprietary manufacturers. The work done by several lay papers and byThe Journalof the American Medical Association and by a few other medical journals is having good results in causing physicians to try to see where they are. There can be no doubt of the justice of the censure that has been passed on a number of proprietary manufacturers. The exposure of their methods has been so complete and the evidence against them so conclusive that there is no room for question. There is no language too strong to use in condemnation of crooked concerns and their methods, but the question arises: For how much of this state of affairs are the members of our profession responsible? If not responsible for the sins of the
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
