Abstract

The two studies presented here were conducted to explore the relationship between metacognitive monitoring and control processes across the life-span. Monitoring processes often guide control processes (goal-oriented learning), yet more recent work also documents that control processes can also be based on feedback from monitoring processes (data-oriented learning). Study 1 provided first evidence for data-oriented learning in older adults and in a life-span perspective. Participants of four age groups (third-grade children, adolescents, younger and older adults) were able to adapt their Judgments-Of-Learning (JOLs) based on their Study Time (ST). Effects were most pronounced for younger and older adults. Study 2 investigated the flexible interplay between goal- and data-oriented learning within one learning task for the first time in older adults and from a life-span perspective. Adolescents and younger adults were able to switch between models while elementary children and older adults hat greater difficulties to do so. Possible causes for developmental trends are discussed. In sum, the integration of both goal- and data-oriented learning within one task seems to be a complex process.

Highlights

  • Metacognitive processes that occur during learning have been studied extensively in children and adults (Schneider & Löffler, 2016; Son & Metcalfe, 2000)

  • The present study aimed at exploring the relationship between metacognitive monitoring and control skills in a broad age range

  • We focused on finding evidence for the data-oriented CM-model in a life-span sample

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Metacognitive processes that occur during learning have been studied extensively in children and adults (Schneider & Löffler, 2016; Son & Metcalfe, 2000). Younger participants in this study relied more on item difficulty than on incentive value of word pairs, indicating that the CM-model had a greater impact on learning behavior than the MC-model. Even 6-year-olds are able to control their learning behavior according to item value (Castel, Lee, Humphreys, & Moore, 2011), this seems to be more difficult when item difficulty greatly varies between item pairs. This might be due to the improvement in executive functions during adolescents (Diamond, 2002)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call