Abstract
We used Hilbert transforms to re-evaluate the previously reported correlation between defibrillation shock outcome and absolute ventricular fibrillation voltage (AVFV). Previously in the literature, single values of AVFV acquired just prior to shock delivery were used to show a correlation between AVFV and shock outcome. In subsequent studies, a modified analysis procedure was used to show a correlation between shock outcome and moving average of AVFV. The use of single values of AVFV makes the AVFV sensitive to the local phase of the electrocardiographic (ECG) waveform, whereas moving averages are weighted by previous values of the ECG. The envelope is independent of the phase of the ECG and is not weighted by previous values of ECG as is the moving average. We explored, therefore, whether the AVFV computed from the envelopes of the ECG showed a stronger correlation with shock outcome than single values and moving averages of the AVFV. We estimated envelopes using the Hilbert transform. Orthogonal ECGs (sagittal, X; transverse, Y; and longitudinal, Z) were recorded from 11 dogs during 10 seconds of electrically induced ventricular fibrillation followed by a defibrillation shock with 50% probability of success. We used transvenous (right ventricular apex to subcutaneous patch) leads to deliver defibrillation shocks. Results from 236 successful and 249 unsuccessful trials showed, in contrast with the previously reported correlation, that moving average of AVFV was not higher for successful trials. In the Z direction, unsuccessful trials had higher voltage than successful trials ( P < .05). Comparison of envelope voltages between successful and unsuccessful trials did not show any consistent and statistically significant differences. Although there were some methodological differences between ours and the previously reported studies, they are unlikely to have caused the discrepant observations. Our results suggest, therefore, that the absolute voltage of ECG during ventricular fibrillation is not robustly correlated with shock outcome.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.