Abstract

Habitat niche breadth for Palearctic Arvicolinae species was estimated at both local (α- niche) and global (the entire geographic range, γ-niche) scales using occurrence records of species and environmental (climate, topography, and vegetation) data. Niche breadth was estimated in the space of the first two principal components of environmental variables using kernel smoothing of the densities of species occurrence points. The breadth of α-niches was estimated for a set of random points inside the geographic range in a series of buffers of increasing size around these points. Within each buffer, we calculated the overlap between the distribution of environment values for the kernel smoothed densities of species occurrence points and the distribution of environment values in the background environment. The α-niche breadth was calculated as the slope of the linear regression of the niche breadth for buffers of different size by the ln area of these buffers with a zero intercept. The γ-niche breadth was calculated as the overlap between the distributions of environmental values for the kernel smoothed densities of species occurrence points over the whole geographic range and the distribution of environmental values in the background environment and also approximated by linear regression of the species’ average α-niche to the geographic range area of this species. The results demonstrated that the geographic range size was significantly related with the α- and γ-niche breadth. The γ-niche breadth was significantly positively correlated with the α-niche breadth. Finally, the differences between the γ-niche breadth values that were directly estimated and extrapolated from the α-niche breadth (Δ) values were positively correlated with the geographic range size. Thus, we conclude that the species occupy larger geographic ranges because they have broader niches. Our estimations of the γ-niche breadth increase with the geographic range size not due to a parallel increase of the environmental diversity (spatial autocorrelation in the environment).

Highlights

  • The ecological niche is one of the central but at the same time most controversial concepts in current ecology

  • We found that the breadth of α-niche was not correlated with geographic range size (r = -0.21; p = 0.270), but was strongly correlated with mean altitude of species’ occurrence points (r = +71; p < 0.0001) and with standard deviation of altitude of species’ occurrence points (r = + 0.68; p < 0.0001)

  • Estimations of γ-niche breadth extrapolated from values of α-niche breadth to log-transformed size of geographic range were not correlated with log-transformed geographic range size (r = +0.043; p = 0.822) but was positively correlated with directly estimated γ-niche breadth (r = +0.65; p < 0.0001), mean altitude of species’ occurrence points (r = +0.56; p = 0.001) and with standard deviation of altitude of species’ occurrence points (r = +0.60; p < 0.0001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ecological niche is one of the central but at the same time most controversial concepts in current ecology. The niche was considered as an attribute of the environment, but later, after Hutchinson's (1957) introduction of the concept of multidimensional hyperspace of niche variables, definitions progressively shifted towards the niche as an attribute of the population (or a species) in relation to its environment (Colwell, 1992). The Eltonian niche is defined by biotic interactions and resource variables at a local (intra-community) scale (Elton, 1927; MacArthur, 1968; Vandermeer, 1972; Leibold; 1995, Soberon, 2007). The ecological niche can be characterized by two parameters, the mean (niche position or centroid) and the variance of the resource use (niche breadth or width) (Hutchinson, 1957; Vandermeer, 1972). Theoretical models of niche evolution consider both, i.e., the evolution of niche width and the niche shifts (Roughgarden, 1972; Holt, Gaines, 1992; Ackermann, Doebeli, 2004; Kawecki, 2008), whereas most empirical studies of niche evolution concentrate on shifts of niche centroids (Pearman et al, 2008)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call