Abstract
The subject matter of this paper belongs to multidisciplinary field consisted primary of urbanism and a part of it – urban design, as well as architecture and other fields, like aesthetics, psychology and economy, which supplement certain standpoints. Urban skyline of cities or large parts of the cities, as urban macro-images, are considered in relation to the nature of their origin – self-generated or being effect of the plan, through phenomenon of visual experience and application of new technologies on facades. The question is which ratio of creativity and planned regulation is optimal in the process of creating visually concur- rent urban skylines. If planned solution of total macro-image is done well, the answer is: all regulations should be kept and creativity has no limits. In other cases, it is necessary to establish flexible scope of regulations, so that single elements of urban skyline could be realized in balance between limitations and desired result. Santrauka Šio straipsnio tema priklauso daugiadiscipliniam laukui, iš esmės sudarytam iš urbanizmo ir urbanistinio dizaino kaip jo dalies, o taip pat iš architektūros ir kitų sričių, tokių kaip estetika, psichologija ir ekonomika, papildančių pagrindinius šio tyrimo atskaitos taškus. Miestų ar didžiųjų jų dalių panorama kaip makro urbanistiniai vaizdai čia tiriami santykyje su jų kilme ir pobūdžiu – iškilę patys savaime ar kaip planavimo rezultatas, kaip vizualiosios patirties fenomenas ar naujų fasado technologijų taikymas. Keliamas klausimas, koks kūrybiškumo ir planuojamo reguliatyvumo santykis yra optimalus, kuriant vizualiąsias miesto panoramas? Jei visa apimančio makrovaizdo suplanuotas sprendimas yra teisingas, tai atsakymas peršasi būtent toks: gali būti taikomas bet koks reguliatyvumas, o kūrybiškumas yra beribis. Visais kitais atvejais būtina steigti lanksčius reguliatyvumus, kad paskiri miesto panoramos elementai galėtų būti realizuoti apribojimų ir siekiamo rezultato, nepažeidžiant šios pusiausvyros.
Highlights
The question in this paper is which ratio of creativity and planned regulation is optimal in the process of creating visually concurrent urban skyline, in other words, its affirmation and desirable shape
Urban policies should be based on innovation and creativity, enabling maintaining character and coherence of urban form as response to social, cultural, economical, technological and / or political development and chang es
If planned solution of total macro-image is done well and specific laws and regulations were established in keeping with it, the answer on question, which ratio of creativity and planned regulation is optimal in the process of creating visually concurrent urban skyline, is simple: all regulations should be kept and creativity has no limits
Summary
The subject matter of this paper belongs to multidisciplinary field consisted pri mary of urbanism and a part of it – urban design, as well as architecture and other fields, like aesthetics, psychology and economy, which supplement certain standpoints. The question is which ratio of creativity and planned regulation is optimal in the process of creating visually concur rent urban skylines. If planned solution of total macro-image is done well, the answer is: all regulations should be kept and creativity has no limits. It is necessary to establish flexible scope of regulations, so that single elements of urban skyline could be realized in balance between limitations and desired result
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
