Abstract

Most people believe in free will, which is foundational for our sense of agency and responsibility. Past research demonstrated that such beliefs are dynamic, and can be manipulated experimentally. Much less is known about free will attitudes (FWAs; do you value free will?), whether they are equally dynamic, and about their relation to free will beliefs (FWBs). If FWAs were strongly positive, people might be reluctant to revise their beliefs even in the face of strong evidence to do so. In this registered report, we developed a novel measure of FWAs and directly related FWBs and attitudes for the first time. We found FWBs and attitudes to be positively related, although to a lesser degree than determinism or dualism beliefs/attitudes. Nevertheless, an experimental manipulation technique aimed at reducing FWBs (Crick text) showed remarkably specific effects on FWBs only, and no effects on FWAs. Overall, these results provide valuable new insights into laypeople's views on free will by including a novel measure of FWAs. They also provide evidence for the validity of a common experimental technique that has been rightfully criticized in the literature lately.

Highlights

  • Whether free will exists or not has been a hotly debated topic in the philosophic discourse for centuries [1]

  • We found a similar pattern for dualism beliefs (DUB) versus dualism attitudes (DUA), t1055 = 10.66, p < 0.001, d = 0.25, confidence interval (CI) = [0.17, 0.34]

  • Neither baseline beliefs nor attitudes, nor any demographic variables had a measurable effect on the strength of the free will beliefs (FWBs) manipulation used here

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Whether free will exists or not has been a hotly debated topic in the philosophic discourse for centuries [1]. Experimental philosophy has started to map out lay beliefs about free will [2,3,4,5,6,7]. This undertaking has important theoretical implications, as philosophical theories on free will are often based on intuitions, and knowing whether such intuitions are widespread or not can be valuable both for academic research [8] and beyond.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call