Abstract
In the last decade the application of the relapse prevention (RP) model to both the conceptualization and the treatment of sexual offenders has emerged as an innovative approach. Underlying the treatment utility of this perspective has been a social learning view of the relapse process in addictive behavior. In this paper we critically examine both Marlatt's original RP model and Pithers' application of this perspective to the sexual offending area. After outlining its basic assumptions, we describe the RP model in some detail. Following a critique of Marlatt's theory, we examine the strengths and weaknesses of Pithers' RP approach. Finally, we conclude with some comments on the implications of our critique.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
