Abstract

6523 Background: Complete remission rates similar to those of younger pts are obtained in elderly AML pts (OSHO AML 1997). However, OS and LFS remain dismal because of extremely high relapse rates. In the AML 2004 study, reduced intensity conditioning SCT was introduced to reduce relapse in patients with a compatible related/unrelated donor. In this analysis we compared outcome of patients with a donor to patients without a donor. Methods: Of the 663 pts, 597 were entered into the study specific arm and 66 in the common arm of the German Intergroup Study. Of those 447 and 52 pts were evaluable, respectively. The majority of pts were male (56.9%), the median age 68 years and the median Karnofsky score 80%. Karyotype was normal in 46.9% and unfavorable in 21.2%, while 55.9% had de novo AML. Induction therapy consisted of AraC 100 mg/m2 c. i. over 7 days / Daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 i.v. on days 3 - 5 in the standard arm and of AraC 2g/m2 on days 1, 3, 5 and 7 / mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 - 3 in the study arm. SCT were performed following reduced intensity conditioning. Results: CR was observed in 62% of pts after induction in the study arm and in 62% in the standard arm. A total of 76 pts had a stem cell donor and 129 no donor. There was no significant difference between the populations except for median age 68 in the chemotherapy vs. 65 a in the SCT arm (p<0.001). OS at 3 a was 35 ± 6% in the chemotherapy compared to 49 ± 6% in the SCT arm. Accordingly, LFS at 3 a was 27 ± 5% for chemotherapy as compared to 39 ± 7% in the SCT arm (p=0.04) and due to reduced relapse incidence (73±5% vs. 45±7%, respectively; p 0.001). Only SCT and favorable risk cytogenetics were independent factors for increased LFS. Both variables were independent risk factors for lower relapse rate, as was de novo AML. In contrast, high WBC at diagnosis and SCT were significantly associated in a multivariate analysis with increased treatment related mortality. Conclusions: SCT in comparison to chemotherapy is associated with increased LFS and lower relapse independently of cytogenetic risk. The biggest differences in LFS and relapse between SCT and chemotherapy were noted among pts with high risk cytogenetic disease.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.