Abstract

Despite the progressively decreasing cost and complexity of videotelephones and computer videoconferencing, the telephone remains the preferred instrument of most psychoanalysts and psychotherapists for treatment at a distance, some even proclaiming the advantages of neither seeing nor being seen. This communication addresses possible causal and consequential implications of this rejection of the visual. Pertinent contributory factors considered include: individual variations in preference for sensory modalities, a neophobic reaction of anxious befuddlement in the face of new technology, habit, and institutionalized bias. The psychoanalytic rationale for the use of the couch with its attendant visual deprivation is reviewed in the light of linguistic theory and research advances in the neuropsychology of nonverbal communication. A survey questionnaire is offered to the reader to help answer some of the questions raised.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.